…and the quest to see everything

InsideOut ’11: We Were Here

You want me to knock an AIDS documentary? Fine, sometimes the end of the interview segments are slowed down before fading out, but that only happens twice. And of course, there was no mention of the hateful acronym GRID, but then this isn’t a pedantic regurgitation of the facts.

David Weissman’s We Were Here is interested in people. It lets its San Franciscan interview subjects begin at the beginning, Ed Wolf as a gay man who couldn’t fit into the cliques, Paul Boneberg continuing the spirit of the hippie era, artist Daniel Goldstein’s early days giving out flyers with Harvey Milk, Guy Clark as a flower shop owner, Eileen Glutzer taking her college feminist ethos and befriending gay men. They were frank and at times humorous about their perceptions about gay sexuality and activity, talking about it as a form of rebellion, an inevitable part of masculine wiring or simply calling it love between friends and boyfriends. Archive photos and footage is very helpful in many sections, showing for instance the big billboards for bath houses when they were still legal in the city, or general images of the men in the peak of their youth which are innately tragic.

ph. fabmagazine

The documentary also eases into the beginning of the AIDS crisis, coming into their lives rapidly. Strong young men were becoming sickly, filling up beds and dying days later. The five separate lives of the subjects become strung together through activism. Glutzer as a nurse braves wards with AIDS patients. Goldstein becomes one of the first affected by the outbreak and survives through medical flukes and emotional rough patches. The film bravely shows the men’s appearances change after being infected and veers into different questions and responses within and outside the community. As a young gay man, admittedly I still don’t realize the disease’s real effects. The film is more hopeful than depressing, showing creative ways in which the  LGBT friendly community helped each other, but both sides of the coin still exist, and I should probably watch this documentary every day. 4/5.

Advertisements

2 responses

  1. First things first – I loved this film. Saw it in the run-up to Hot Docs and actually had to pause it and gather myself because it was depressing me so much. (Even interviewed the director if you go back a few episodes of the podcast)

    That said, this post perplexes me.

    The negative point you start with, did you mention it just because it’s something you see often and wanted a moment to rant? I ask because it felt like an angry way to start writing about a film you clearly dug quite a lot!

    May 24, 2011 at 3:05 pm

  2. It’s some stubborn philosophy that no movie is perfect, even if the subject matter is too hollowed to be criticized. I’m more of a ‘wow them in the end.

    And the movie only depressed me in the beginning, seeing that the previous generation was oblivious of what’s to come. I was fine with the rest, seeing the sliver lining. I saw Bridesmaids literally before this movie and Bridesmaids depressed me more. I will explain.

    May 25, 2011 at 5:16 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s