…and the quest to see everything

Psycho stories and shots

Sorry for the short blog hiatus! There’s more of that to come, unfortunately.

Instead of talking about my favourite shot from Psycho – that’ll come later – or my long-ass history with arguably Alfred Hitchcock’s masterpiece, or my veneration for the woman with the coolest CV in Hollywood (Janet Leigh) and the man with the coolest CV in Hollywood (Martin Balsam) I’ll talk about a shot and a story that I’m probably not supposed to tell. This story also means that I can’t talk about what school I went to, although I probably can’t keep my mouth shut for that long. And that despite the slight Schadenfreude, I feel bad about telling this story because the same things that I might imply on this person might also be said about me.

As a background, in my college, there is a great film professor pushing into his emeritus years. If you wanted an introduction to ways of thinking and philosophy from the 20th century and beyond, he’s your guy. He is much beloved by the earlier classes but the dissent against his has been coming stronger as new generations of students come. My ambivalent opinion towards him doesn’t make the fact that I’m unemployable because I like talking shit any less true.

So me and an alum were talking about B film ‘Hobo With a Shotgun,’ that recently had its Canadian première. I hesitated on saying that I hated it, he was talking about its merits and deeper nuances, about how the film treats. “So, like, the Drake character is Stephen Harper and Rutger Hauer is some guy in some other political party or ‘the people’ or something?”

“No, not that deep.”

“Sorry. I guess it’s the _ _ _ _ _ _ _ training in me that make me over-analyze things.” Although I do believe that every film is political and social, a belief that will lead to a story that I will never tell unless we meet in person.

“Oh, God. Him. It’s like every film to him is about the economy. Like for Psycho. For genre class he made a shot-by-shot analysis of the shower scene. At the end he showed the shot of the drain, and asked the class ‘What do you see?’ You know what he said?”

“The swirling of the water is reminiscent of the dollar sign,” I asked sarcastically.

“ZERO!”

“NO!”

“And I shit you not, _ _ _ _  _ _ _ _ yelled ‘Bullshit,’ walked out of the room and never took his classes again.”

“That is kinda funny. I have _ _ _ _ on my Facebook. I should write on his wall sometime.”

I’m haunted by that sequence because the chunky blood that comes out of Marion Crane (Leigh), eventually being diluted in the water for that ‘zero’ moment.

What’s also ironic is that while I’m talking out of my ass, I’m using one of my prof’s shot-counter shot analysis that he intended for Vertigo – another clue – and how in the earlier scenes, the backgrounds used for Jimmy Stewart’s character had clean geometric borders while the Barbara bel Geddes character worked around a hot mess.  The same thing happens here in Psycho, where two characters are literally a few feet away from each other yet the spaces are clearly bordered. Marion sits in front of a relatively blank wallpaper while Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins) chooses to sit with his creepy stuffed birds. The clutter around him shows his conflicted, angry mind while she’s fine if a bit delusional.

Despite Marion’s blood and her effects, the  bathroom feels clean when Norman enters. It’s as if doing the deed is a method of purgation for him. The clouds and the fog hours before seem to disappear for him, the dead trees making way for his brooding face.

Or to a lesser extent, there’s one particular shot with Lila Crane (Vera Miles) and Sam Loomis (wooden John Gavin). It’s a little bit smoky on Lila’s side while the downtown buildings serve as a background for Sam. We can argue which parts of the mise-en-scene make one more troubled than the other, but I like this shot because it’s pretty.

Then there’s the last scene, showing Norman imprisoned around the ultimate void, when the battle’s been won.

This has been part of Nathaniel Rogers’ “Hit Me With Your Best Shot” series.

6 responses

  1. I love this post – I’d noticed some ‘split’ shots in Psycho this last time round watching it, but you’ve convinced me its clearly one of the key visual strategies of the film. Both the Marion/Norman and Lila/Sam shots are great, but I particularly like the second, partly because they aren’t looking at each other – off in their own seperate worlds, psychologically and visually. Plus, its gorgeous to look at.

    My favourite bit:

    “Despite Marion’s blood and her effects, the bathroom feels clean when Norman enters. It’s as if doing the deed is a method of purgation for him. The clouds and the fog hours before seem to disappear for him, the dead trees making way for his brooding face.”

    I probably won’t be able to watch the film from now on without seeing this bit of the film through this lens. It works so perfectly!

    March 31, 2011 at 7:27 am

  2. I love the wall with the creepy birds. I always have the impression that he’ll place Marion’s head among them after he kills her.

    March 31, 2011 at 12:09 pm

  3. Laika: That’s the best complement I’ve ever received in my year of blogging. Thank you! I also just noticed the difference between Norman/Marion and Lilah/Sam is that the latter group works well as a team even if they’re not trying to ‘connect’ as closely as the former. It’s like some divisions are reconcilable and others, despite the force, actually makes things worse.

    Jose: I just posted the craziest, creepiest movie pitch at Nathaniel’s wall, but ‘Marion’s head’ tops it. I salute you.

    March 31, 2011 at 12:35 pm

  4. Dan

    Wonderful shots. Hitchcock was not only a master of cinematic drama but also mise en scene. Psycho is a great indication of his genius. You could analyse each of his films with the same sort of attention to detail and draw just as much from them. I think Rear Window is one of the greatest examples of Hitchcock at his visual best.

    April 7, 2011 at 4:01 pm

    • Vertigo is his visual best, or that’s that’s the first movie that comes to mind. There’s moments in Psycho, too, when he looks as if he’s using real locations, mastering how to orchestrate the outside world that his characters like Marion try to survive.

      April 7, 2011 at 10:44 pm

      • Dan

        Vertigo looks great but the way he uses point of view in Rear Window – ie. we only view the world for much of the film through Jimmy Stewart’s window, makes it stand out for me. Both great films though.

        April 9, 2011 at 4:54 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s